On Forest Fires: Terrain Denial Fires

Is that what we saw in Maui, California, Canada and Greece?

A friend of mine recently brought a two-year-old article to my attention entitled TERRAIN DENIAL FIRES ON THE MODERN BATTLEFIELD from the Lieber Institute at the West Point U.S. Military Academy. It’s one of those articles that seems way too overwritten, which suggests to me they are trying to downplay some war crimes by overcomplicating what it is that they are talking about.

The article states:

Over the years media reports of “terrain denial” missions in Afghanistan have breathlessly described a campaign “involving manned and unmanned aircraft and unguided and guided munitions” as “a deliberate and coordinated effort to strip away actual terrain features—narrow mountainous paths, rock-topped ridgelines, and even buildings and other man-made structures—that militants might use.” They have compared it to the so-called “carpet bombing” campaigns of prior conflicts.

The author later goes on to write:

A Proposed Definition

Based on reported practice and relevant doctrine, a proposed definition of terrain denial fires is: direct or indirect fires intended to hinder, delay, or prevent the enemy from using terrain, space, or facilities.

There are already active denial directed energy weapons, so would it be farfetched to believe that they could be using some kind of sophisticated technology for terrain denial fire attacks?

I find it ironic that government institutions have exploited both COVID and climate change agendas to attack our biological terrain (via Operation Warp Speed and other measures) as well as topographical terrain (via geoengineering, fires and other measures).

It’s no surprise the U.S. government can’t account for a missing $21 trillion.