Propaganda, Narrative Management, Indoctrination & Denial Has Created An Infinite COVID Loop

It's like walking into the same glass door over and over again.

Look. I’m not a scientist. I’m not a clinician. I understand experience is important. But one thing that will always trump experience is basic logic. It doesn’t matter how credentialed you believe yourself to be, if you’re unable to take a step back to look at the big picture you’re going to be overanalyzing minutiae to no avail. Don’t agree? Too bad. I’m the captain now.

There are these seemingly never-ending Twitter Spaces where people debate whether or not the COVID “vaccines” are safe and effective. It doesn’t matter that they clearly didn’t prevent illness. It doesn’t matter that data suggests the more shots you get, the more COVID you get (and of course the laughable “fact checkers” scrambled to do damage control on that one). It doesn’t matter how many people report injuries. It doesn’t matter how many statistical patterns emerge from those reports (there have been too many). It doesn’t matter what the autopsies say. It doesn’t matter that autopsies are suspiciously getting denied. It doesn’t matter that blood got really frickin’ weird in 2021.

The online COVID cult—oftentimes made up of medical professionals and scientists—always defer to statements like, “There is no mechanism to cause all those injuries” right before admitting in “rare” cases the shots can cause myocarditis, paralysis and even death. Great. There is no mechanism but there is a mechanism at the same time. Science! They also say, “You can’t prove the vaccine caused those injuries” while they themselves are unable to prove that they weren’t caused by the shots. To me, this is an admission they don’t actually know what’s going on inside the body and this is likely why they desperately pontificate until they’re blue in the face.

I was in one of these spaces a couple days ago. There was the typical back-and-forth of people challenging the COVID cult who shared the typical studies which contradict the reality we’re living through. When pressed on the excess mortality we’ve seen for the past couple years, they say it can’t be the vaccines and they dance around the idea of it being COVID-related. They can’t push the COVID idea too hard because these were the same people that said the shots were supposed to protect you from both COVID and its persisting symptoms. So, they generally end up saying it’s a mystery. I find it incredible that these know-it-alls suddenly can’t pinpoint the giant elephant in the (worldwide) room.

It became crystal clear to me that this was more than a bunch of broken records spewing psychobabble when it was my turn to talk. Every single time I came up with new angles to challenge the cult, they would interrupt me. Once, it was because I referenced data from Alberta Health Services.

You’ll see in the graph above that people were most likely to get a COVID diagnosis within 21 days of getting their first shot regardless of seasonality. Many of those people were hospitalized and died. If you recall, it was common for countries to consider people “unvaccinated” within the first 14 days after their first shot and, if they were getting a two-shot series, “partially vaccinated” until 14 days after their second shot. So, this means a lot of COVID deaths were labeled as “unvaccinated” or “partially vaccinated” after actually having been vaccinated. If people survived until they were deemed fully vaccinated, they would then seem like protected “vaccinated” persons (many of whom just had infections).

The smug scientist who talked over me uses the same default defense everyone is taught to use: It takes two weeks for the shots to kick in (although he says it in a much more complicated way due to his superiority complex). Yeah, cool. I know the talking points, too. Search engines are fun. It still doesn’t explain the concerning data above, but it sure does show us how one can use classification to get the perception of positive results.

He’s mocking us.

But it was another interruption that really tipped me off that there is something odd going on in these spaces. Every time people bring up excess all-cause mortality from 2021 and 2022, the cult simply points to excess death in 2020 and states that we were in a pandemic. When people rebut by saying these more recent deaths weren’t determined to be COVID, the cult says they could be issues caused by a previous COVID infection. The invisible boogeyman is fun for them, because they can say it does so many different things without definitive proof just like they can say the shots are safe without definitive proof.

When I changed the angle a bit, as I like to do, it struck a nerve within the cult. I suggested that their premise of a pandemic in 2020 might be a little misguided, as essentially all of the excess death where I live (New York City) happened when hospital protocols for COVID-19 were implemented. The only big spike in death that year came during an 11-week period between March and May, even though it was evident people had COVID long before that. The cult wants to tell you fairytales of COVID mutating and changing in virulence coincidentally at the same time health authorities were issuing protocols worldwide, but, once again, they cannot provide proof to support their claims.

When I brought up the use of ventilators (or shall I say misuse?) all hell broke loose. Both the smug scientist and a less obvious cult member would simultaneously speak over me. The latter would scream, “You’re not a clinician!” I shot back, “Neither are you!” The smug scientist interjected saying, “You didn’t read anything about this topic.” I immediately responded, “You haven’t read more than I have on this topic.” As I tried to make my point—the importance of which doesn’t take two brain cells to comprehend—the first clown would again interrupt me by condescendingly stating that I called myself an expert on the topic (which I never did). These guys fed off of each other to the point where they made the asinine claim that ventilators weren’t part of COVID-19 protocols, which is why I’m sure the Department of Health and Human Services wrote a 43-page document entitled Optimizing Ventilator Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic. 🤡🤡 < them

It reeked of some chaos agent fuckery.

Just part of the my greater point.

I hoped that the host—a generally pleasant and open-minded skeptic—would silence the wildly out of line speakers so I could simply finish my thoughts. However, I found myself getting muted. What happened next was one of the wildest things I have experienced on that platform. The smug scientist—who tends to spend way too much time in Twitter Spaces where he eats up as much of the speaking time as possible and hurls insults around like “flat Earther”—said we should listen to a doctor about the topic I hadn’t even finished making my point about.

The doctor, who apparently pre-blocked me, ascended to the speaker position and turned what I thought was meant to be a thoughtful, intelligent conversation into her own lecture hall. She said, “I will take questions from everyone except R!CKY,” so you knew she was ridiculous from the jump because no one aside from 🤡🤡 asked for that. Of course, we live in a world where we oftentimes let credentialism overshadow rationalism. Her arrogance reminded me of that blackout drunk Irish guy at the pub who attempts to goad people into barfights. She’s the kind of person who can’t accept that doctors not only make fatal mistakes, but follow really bad orders from higher-ups (much like cops) in hospital settings.

So, we’re not allowed to talk about the third leading cause of death maybe contributing to an anomalous spike in mortality that led to a clearly preplanned rollout of fraudulent medical interventions several months after the excess death actually happened?

That told me everything I needed to know. I was right on target. 🎯

Again…

In all of her rambling, she would very quickly and casually admit that some drugs weren’t working and they found drugs that worked later on. She also touched on using remdesivir “at the right time” but failed to mention that in a hospital setting it’s almost always too late. She also conveniently left out that remdesivir can cause organ failure. But let’s not talk about iatrocide, amirite?

After minutes of lecturing listeners, she opened the hijacked room up for questions. A passionate and—more importantly—compassionate man started making some good points (mostly about vaccines as he has committed much of his time to documenting vaccine injuries). The arrogant doctor was extremely rude and talked over and down to him several times. Unfortunately, the mute button wasn’t used fairly in this space.

A lot of what the doctor had to say was rather appalling, including her defense of the FDA putting out misleading propaganda and giving medical advice which certainly falls outside their purview.

“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. But 108.6K of you are sheep.”

So, I have deduced that there are a lot of agents in these Twitter Spaces and a lot of the people who have been brainwashed into these false paradigms end up mimicking agents as they become more tribal. It’s very difficult to determine whose job it is to be there and who has simply become obsessed with the groupthink. Either way, it shouldn’t be this hard for them to defend an already widely accepted status quo. The fact that they can’t answer some of the most important questions—on top of not allowing the most paramount ideas to be talked about at all—tells me that they are running cover whether they know it or not.

What an incredible experience. As the powers that be plan for masking and lockdowns in the fall, one can only hope some more people will see that the order of operations is a bit off: The rules come way before the illness.