There Was No Evidence Of A Novel Pathogen In 2020 | Part II: Protocols
A health emergency by decree rather than evidence.
This is a follow-up to a post which focused on #TheNewYorkProblem—that is, the evidence from spring of 2020 that was more akin to a bomb dropping on The Big Apple rather than a new pathogen spreading organically. Of course, if the data suggests that it wasn’t a novel pathogen but people were indeed dying at an elevated rate, we had better find some evidence that contradicts what would be the biggest psyop since 9/11 because mainstream media has programmed people to think otherwise.
Stress.
To kick this one off, I felt it appropriate to start with a “Never Have I Ever” video from the TikTok account of Casey Baker that reminds us exactly how bad healthcare in America was as we were heading into COVID, as well as what went down in the early days of it.
Yes, they were taking babies away from hospitalized mothers. Yes, the elderly were left isolated. They traumatized our most vulnerable to…save the most vulnerable? Umm…? This is where it all starts for me—stress. It’s the co-factor we often forget. It can really take its toll on us and, if you’re already unwell, it can be a killer.
Lockdowns.
wrote an important piece entitled Questions for lockdown apologists which made the astute observation that giant spikes in mortality only happened immediately after a country instituted a lockdown. If that wasn’t good enough, his follow-up piece Questions for Lockdown Apologists: Why was the virus late to Mexico? shows us that, while cities in America already had a month of noticeable excess mortality, this so-called virus seemed to be honoring borders (although it was suggested it had spread around the world via international air travel months before). The following chart from Mexico City’s data clues us in.This is interesting because it suggests that school closures, social distancing and the banning of large gatherings didn’t (initially, at least) contribute to the massive spike in both COVID and all-cause mortality. However, it does suggest that implementing emergency protocols did.
Not only did this clever virus prefer to ravage America before Mexico, it particularly liked New York over other densely populated cities as reported by
. adds clarity.AJ Kay made a bold statement back on April 22, 2020 with her article The Ban on Elective Procedures is Killing More People Than COVID-19. In it, the author makes this crucial clarification:
The classification of a procedure as “elective” is not as intuitive as one might imagine.
There are only two types of procedures: emergent and elective. Emergent procedures must be performed without delay, typically to save the life of the patient. Conversely, any procedure that can be scheduled in advance (regardless of how far in advance) is deemed elective.
It’s important not to conflate ‘elective’ with ‘optional’. Optional procedures are done for reasons other than the patient’s health (i.e. cosmetic surgery) and while all optional procedures are elective, not all elective procedures are optional.
Examples of elective procedures include: coronary artery bypasses, pacemaker insertions, spinal fusions, cancer resections, tumor biopsies, organ donations, gallbladder and kidney stone removals, orthopedic repairs, joint replacements, blood work, diagnostic imaging, ECGs & EKGs, cardiac catheterizations, nerve-block injections, colonoscopies, mammograms, and bone marrow transplants.
Delay of these elective procedures is no small matter, either for the patients who need them, nor for the healthcare facilities who provide them.
On top of all that, people were encouraged to stay inside. Many public parks were closed. This means that people were not exercising and receiving as much sunshine as they had been. Most restaurants had to shut down, forcing more people to go shopping at the handful of local supermarkets that only let so many people in at once due to absurd social distancing policies. Meanwhile, liquor stores were considered essential services for unknown reasons. In cities with a vibrant independent restaurant scene (like NYC) there were many neighborhoods with more places to buy booze than food. Add all that to the aforementioned stress and you have a recipe for disaster.
points out that a lot of the death bad actors like to talk about when blaming COVID for excess mortality during this time were actually due to drug overdoses like his son.Sadly, it doesn’t stop there.
Care. Or lack thereof.
Protocols came from authoritative institutions like the American Medical Association and the World Health Organization. Invasive, closed intubation was going to “stop the spread” of a virus that they had never proven to exist. Knowing that elective procedures—a huge swath of a hospital’s income—had been paused, there were obvious financial incentives to follow commands.
Rather early in the lockdown period, doctors and nurses were coming forward to share information they thought could save lives. New York City ICU doctor Cameron Kyle-Sidell would go viral when he uploaded the following video to YouTube on March 31, 2020.
“We are operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue. In short, I believe we are treating the wrong disease and I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time.” —Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell
Narrative managers swooped in quickly to address this video. The doctor would go on to upload four more videos on the topic, but the additional videos would disappear in a matter of weeks.
What exactly were they trying to hide? Well, we might have some more clues. On April 22, 2020, The Washington Post published the following story:
Five days later, the title would change…
Once you see you it, you can’t unsee it.
Over three years later, it’s pretty safe to say the protocols should have been changed and that COVID did indeed require different treatment. Nurse Nicole Sirotek, who also went viral that spring, would agree.
She didn’t mince words when she said the people that were in the New York hospitals she had worked at were not dying from COVID. Although many healthcare workers were not this brave, the message did find its way across the country.
The warnings in this video align perfectly with the questions
has been asking.The nurse also mentioned “do not resuscitate” (DNR) orders in NYC hospitals. Forbes would dishonestly point to them being overwhelmed, but they weren’t overwhelmed by the number of patients as many articles suggest. These hospitals were overwhelmed by the amount of people that were dying because of the protocols being implemented.
To add to the confusion of bad protocols and traveling nurses in constant rotation, some of the most experienced doctors were reassigned so they no longer saw patients.
And finally,
breaks down clips from a third nurse.She makes it very clear that people dying at Elmhurst Hospital who had not tested positive for COVID were being labeled as COVID patients. One might challenge the validity of the patient chart shown in this video, but she’s not the only one making these types of claims and it’s not only being observed in America. From UK data…
One would think with all of this information available, we could see past this fearmongering of a “pandemic by novel pathogen,” but as
writes, poor protocols like ventilation continued killing people designated as COVID patients for years (and continues to do so) in Canada.There was no good system in place to halt this madness anywhere in the world, showing us how powerful and corrupt health authorities have become.
And I’m just getting started.
All they did was rebrand the flu, scare the pants off people and kill them with ventilators and remdesivir in the hospitals
Be careful about who you think was a real or brave whistleblower vs a staged or contrived one, even if the truths being told largely sound