Perpetuating Scientific Fraud Through Storytelling | The Lab Leak Theory
Is the evidence there?
On June 23rd, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declassified a report on the potential links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. The big takeaway is that America’s shady three-letter agencies all seemingly have a different theory as to what went down:
• The National Intelligence Council and four other IC agencies assess that the initial human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was caused by natural exposure to an infected animal that carried SARS-CoV-2 or a close progenitor, a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARSCoV-2.
• The Department of Energy and the Federal Bureau of Investigation assess that a laboratory-associated incident was the most likely cause of the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2, although for different reasons.
• The Central Intelligence Agency and another agency remain unable to determine the precise origin of the COVID-19 pandemic, as both hypotheses rely on significant assumptions or face challenges with conflicting reporting.
• Almost all IC agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not genetically engineered. Most agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not laboratory-adapted; some are unable to make a determination. All IC agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not developed as a biological weapon.
Do you ever feel like the government has people going in circles over the origins of COVID? Well, that’s probably because the government has people going in circles and they always end right back up at the lab leak theory.
Once again, I must point people to my piece on the false flag “rule of three” (a term I coined). When running a massive psychological operation—and you’ll find none greater than COVID—it’s important to understand that they lead with a story that people who don’t really want to think will gladly settle on. In this case, a pathogen of natural origin was perfect for that. The possible culprit—be it a bat, pangolin, raccoon dog, whatever—keeps changing and that’s enough spice to satisfy the needs of basic consumers of propaganda.
But, according to my “rule of three,” you need a second popular theory to catch all those skeptics who think they are too clever to be tricked. Enter the lab leak, complete with its own set of propagandists ready to mesmerize you with never-ending debates and no real evidence whatsoever. This very much mirrors the nano-thermite/controlled demolition crowd from 9/11.
People often ask me, “So, where did the virus come from then?”
What virus?
When fear and illness are at play, it’s really easy to skip some steps to quickly get people clinging to narratives. It’s not logical at all, but the whole point of a psyop is to disarm people of their ability to critically think. Of course there was a virus! People got sick! Science!
Let’s take a step back. How did we learn there was a virus?
In January of 2020, doctors in China allegedly told the World Health Organization they discovered a novel pathogen that was making people ill in Wuhan. The WHO allegedly received the genetic sequence from China and then sent it over to Dr. Fauci and company over at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Then, Dr. Fauci sent this information over to some pharmaceutical companies.
In just hours, BioNTech would allegedly design a “vaccine” candidate that they would later work on with Pfizer. In just two days, a decade-old company with DARPA money that had never brought a product to market named Moderna suddenly figured out how to make something. This was incredibly convenient for Moderna, as they had just signed a joint agreement with NIAID and UNC Chapel Hill for an mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate in the previous month (before it was announced that a coronavirus was causing an illness in Wuhan). It’s almost as if Moderna’s investors were betting billions on a future event! Might this company that was once considered to be failing secretly developing this product for years?
Over the next year, the alleged virus would be blamed for excess death for a short stint in some countries, but not all of them. There was excess death logged in some metropolitan areas, but not others. Isn’t it strange that a virus recognized borders? Does that sound like a virus to you?
In January of 2021, Dr. Wu Zunyou from the Chinese Center for Disease Control would drop a doozy on NBC Nightly News that they would let air.
Wait…what’s this? They didn’t isolate the virus? And animals testing positive don’t tell you anything about the origin of the illness? And he believes COVID is coming from something other than what had been initially suspected?
This means they didn’t send a genetic sequence from an isolated virus to the WHO? And the WHO didn’t send it to Fauci? And Fauci didn’t send it to BioNTech and Moderna?
Well, well, well…
What about PCR?
What about it? What does PCR detect? Genetic material. If you’re sick with COVID, your body may produce genetic material that is detectable with a PCR test. Does this mean you have a coronavirus? No.
This is a video of PCR inventor and Nobel Prize-winner Kary Mullis explaining how PCR results can be interpreted wrong to interviewer Gary Null. Suspiciously, Kary’s health deteriorated quickly in 2019 and he passed away at the age of 74 just months before the first cases of COVID were officially recognized. When the whole world was getting locked down and swabbed in the following year, there was no voice more valuable than his that was missing. To watch his full interview with Gary Null, click here.
Okay, maybe it’s not a virus. Then what do you think it is, Mr. Rants?!?
Stay tuned!