So we’ll done as usual. Ricky has to be the most underrated writer on Substack. Researches and digs deeper than about anyone with his eyewitness reports and gets a variety of analyses on both sides.
We tend to agree on a lot. Here is where I land. My instincts tell me this was coordinated at many levels. How much is the difficult part? We had rah rah rallying of big social media personalities Musk almost immediately (who I like ) but plays to emotions well.
Will add a few other peculiar oddities. CNN has k no or had a camera crew on site for any Trump rallies per Grok.
Also the same photographer that captured the 9/11 iconic shot of Bush chief of staff telling him about the WTC being hit by planes ✈️ happens to capture the most iconic assignation attempt in over 60 years. Grok said he has never been to a Trump rally.
I wonder about the bleeding 🩸 and the ear as you alluded to. Seems highly improbable and suspect.
Hard to dispute someone dying when family members say so. But, people in power have faked killing people before. Challenger looks like there is good evidence of several of them still living with similar careers just 38 years older.
Also , it may have been you Ricky. But , somebody did a great documentary on rumble of Ashley Babbitt and when you watch the actors around that shooting staging was totally in play.
Death sells emotions better than anything. So , don’t get to caught up in it. These people in power have so much at stake and technology and AI behind them to tell the story they want you to believe
Thank you for the kind words and input. I still haven’t gotten this one completely figured out (and I may not ever) but I think we are on the right track.
As far as J6 analysis goes, Wooz News hit it out of the park.
It was the first thing I noticed: lack of blood by the shooter. I had a thought after ppl said Trump was miraculously saved from death. Revelation 13:3. The Deadly Wound To The Head that is healed. (Did a post if anyone wants to see it.) I think this is political theater with Biden / Trump. Not sure who they plan to win this.
I didn't believe this story from the start :) That guy standing behind Trump who started ''looking around'' for the shooter. It looked very theatrical. Plus, they all just stood there. Nobody was scrambling to get out of the way. It was similar to Rita Isbell's fake outburst during Jeff Dahmer's trial. Nobody at the defense table even flinched as she started to move toward them while ranting.
Stories steer behaviour and generate reactions as well as affecting the way people vote. If the intention is to introduce a digital economy and society based on blockchain and cybernetics, they will want to monitor and exploit humans. The fourth industrial revolution programs are being advanced by powerful interests who have enough money to buy both sides.
Amazing piece as always, great work compiling data while withholding judgment. For me the bottom line is that no one gets that close to the president with a rifle alone. I don't think it's faked in the sense that trump wasn't shot. I definitely think someone tried to kill him for real and his injury is real. But other than that, it's chaos and you've captured that chaos very well.
The thing about the kid that messes with me most is no social media presence. Just no. There's no way someone willing and able to suicide mission this never posted anything. 0% chance of that, so that's my biggest red flag about the official identity.
The photos and stuff, blood trails and the like, I wonder if we're deep enough in the deepfake era to not trust the "photos."
The video of the tree obstructed sniper team does match that guy's narrative in my opinion, them being blocked by a tree explains their behavior. I said immediately on seeing that video that I didn't see anyone taking a shot in it.
If they are lying about the identity of the shooter, and planned to, this was much bigger than it theoretically could have been. If the shooter was using an AR with a red dot at 400 feet and it was zeroed, trump is VERY lucky to be alive.
The bullet smear capture gives me pause, but it's not a deal breaker. It tracks with some other things I know from my photography hobby days. (I even shot a wedding once XD)
Tons of data and food for thought here, great work.
I don't think I ever commented on this one. I've been MIA for a while here. Okay, so get this. A friend of mine told me he found out the rally or whatever they call it was filmed by a company that uses AI to create crowd footage for companies that need to give their media a boost. He posted an analysis here:
When he told me it not only looked like AI, but was credited as having been created by a company that uses AI, I took a closer look and none of the bloodstains match the story of how the person was shot. Someone smeared fake blood all over their legs in all the wrong places, and it's 100% fake. Most people would never notice, though. I'm no expert, but I have studied bloodstain patterns quite a bit and this one is so far off it's not even funny.
But the wildest part that undeniably gives this away as AI in my book is the inclusion of the word "JURYSTA" on the backpack of the military type officer. At first, I thought maybe that was a brand I had never heard of. I love tactical backpacks. So I searched and could not find anything. But what I did find searching for "JURYSTA" was a witness who was in the Trump crowd named Ron Jurysta (surprise!) and was one of two people the media showed footage of over and over and over:
The way AI works is any information you feed your model, it will spit out in random ways. It looks like they included the name of that witness (Jurysta) in their model somewhere, and the AI system just used that word to place on the backpack because it knows the backpack needs a brand name, but it only knows what it's being fed... hence the JURYSTA fake brand name.
And we won't even get into the mangled fingers that AI can't get right :-D
So we’ll done as usual. Ricky has to be the most underrated writer on Substack. Researches and digs deeper than about anyone with his eyewitness reports and gets a variety of analyses on both sides.
We tend to agree on a lot. Here is where I land. My instincts tell me this was coordinated at many levels. How much is the difficult part? We had rah rah rallying of big social media personalities Musk almost immediately (who I like ) but plays to emotions well.
Will add a few other peculiar oddities. CNN has k no or had a camera crew on site for any Trump rallies per Grok.
Also the same photographer that captured the 9/11 iconic shot of Bush chief of staff telling him about the WTC being hit by planes ✈️ happens to capture the most iconic assignation attempt in over 60 years. Grok said he has never been to a Trump rally.
I wonder about the bleeding 🩸 and the ear as you alluded to. Seems highly improbable and suspect.
Hard to dispute someone dying when family members say so. But, people in power have faked killing people before. Challenger looks like there is good evidence of several of them still living with similar careers just 38 years older.
Also , it may have been you Ricky. But , somebody did a great documentary on rumble of Ashley Babbitt and when you watch the actors around that shooting staging was totally in play.
Death sells emotions better than anything. So , don’t get to caught up in it. These people in power have so much at stake and technology and AI behind them to tell the story they want you to believe
Thank you for the kind words and input. I still haven’t gotten this one completely figured out (and I may not ever) but I think we are on the right track.
As far as J6 analysis goes, Wooz News hit it out of the park.
It was the first thing I noticed: lack of blood by the shooter. I had a thought after ppl said Trump was miraculously saved from death. Revelation 13:3. The Deadly Wound To The Head that is healed. (Did a post if anyone wants to see it.) I think this is political theater with Biden / Trump. Not sure who they plan to win this.
I think they're elevating Trump and distracting people from real issues.
I didn't believe this story from the start :) That guy standing behind Trump who started ''looking around'' for the shooter. It looked very theatrical. Plus, they all just stood there. Nobody was scrambling to get out of the way. It was similar to Rita Isbell's fake outburst during Jeff Dahmer's trial. Nobody at the defense table even flinched as she started to move toward them while ranting.
Stories steer behaviour and generate reactions as well as affecting the way people vote. If the intention is to introduce a digital economy and society based on blockchain and cybernetics, they will want to monitor and exploit humans. The fourth industrial revolution programs are being advanced by powerful interests who have enough money to buy both sides.
whatabunchakooks
Amazing piece as always, great work compiling data while withholding judgment. For me the bottom line is that no one gets that close to the president with a rifle alone. I don't think it's faked in the sense that trump wasn't shot. I definitely think someone tried to kill him for real and his injury is real. But other than that, it's chaos and you've captured that chaos very well.
The thing about the kid that messes with me most is no social media presence. Just no. There's no way someone willing and able to suicide mission this never posted anything. 0% chance of that, so that's my biggest red flag about the official identity.
The photos and stuff, blood trails and the like, I wonder if we're deep enough in the deepfake era to not trust the "photos."
The video of the tree obstructed sniper team does match that guy's narrative in my opinion, them being blocked by a tree explains their behavior. I said immediately on seeing that video that I didn't see anyone taking a shot in it.
If they are lying about the identity of the shooter, and planned to, this was much bigger than it theoretically could have been. If the shooter was using an AR with a red dot at 400 feet and it was zeroed, trump is VERY lucky to be alive.
The bullet smear capture gives me pause, but it's not a deal breaker. It tracks with some other things I know from my photography hobby days. (I even shot a wedding once XD)
Tons of data and food for thought here, great work.
I don't think I ever commented on this one. I've been MIA for a while here. Okay, so get this. A friend of mine told me he found out the rally or whatever they call it was filmed by a company that uses AI to create crowd footage for companies that need to give their media a boost. He posted an analysis here:
https://infocrypt.substack.com/p/trump-shooting-video-proven-to-be
When he told me it not only looked like AI, but was credited as having been created by a company that uses AI, I took a closer look and none of the bloodstains match the story of how the person was shot. Someone smeared fake blood all over their legs in all the wrong places, and it's 100% fake. Most people would never notice, though. I'm no expert, but I have studied bloodstain patterns quite a bit and this one is so far off it's not even funny.
But the wildest part that undeniably gives this away as AI in my book is the inclusion of the word "JURYSTA" on the backpack of the military type officer. At first, I thought maybe that was a brand I had never heard of. I love tactical backpacks. So I searched and could not find anything. But what I did find searching for "JURYSTA" was a witness who was in the Trump crowd named Ron Jurysta (surprise!) and was one of two people the media showed footage of over and over and over:
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6357959819112
The way AI works is any information you feed your model, it will spit out in random ways. It looks like they included the name of that witness (Jurysta) in their model somewhere, and the AI system just used that word to place on the backpack because it knows the backpack needs a brand name, but it only knows what it's being fed... hence the JURYSTA fake brand name.
And we won't even get into the mangled fingers that AI can't get right :-D
This is just another story that never happened!
Very good, sleuth!