Why Saying "COVID Doesn't Exist" Actually Helps Tyrants
To understand language, you need to understand people.
One of the topics I’ve written about on this ‘Stack is viruses. When I was working on The “No Virus” Argument Is NOT A Distraction, I made sure to write simply so I could get my point across to as many people as possible. When approaching a subject I believe people might have an immediate defensive response to, I tend to use language that assures them that I understand why they believe the things that they do. Preaching at people doesn’t tend to work if you’re not in a position of authority. I think we’ve learned that the hard way as of late.
Flooding the internet with “Viruses don’t exist!” without greater context isn’t a very strong tactic. When someone takes the time to break down why they believe viruses don’t exist, they’re much more likely to connect with people who keep an open mind. Because I know that people are familiar with photos taken from microscopy that allegedly depict viruses, I will often say that viruses don’t exist as defined. That wording doesn’t always sit well with the prideful group that just recently realized viruses have never been purified, but unfortunately they are too caught up in their own egos to understand those words in particular were not directed towards them.
When trying to tackle the terribly flawed and highly protected germ theory paradigm that we operate under today, we have to be strategic in how we connect with the vast—I mean vast—majority of the world that believes in invisible boogeymen.
This poll being run on Twitter/X is clearly being shared by a niche group who understand that no virus has ever been properly purified with methods that don’t bomard patient samples with contaminants. SARS-CoV-2 is an alleged virus that is responsible for a certain set of symptoms labeled as COVID-19. This poll is about a disease, yet the comments seemed to be about a virus:
This is false. The disease COVID-19 does not exist as a computer-generated sequence as it is a clinical diagnosis. There are a lot of these anonymous accounts that promote the idea that viruses do not exist but consistently get simple facts wrong. Unfortunately, because there is a desperate attempt by a small group of people to shed light on the fraudulent methods of virology, these fact-challenged accounts often get promoted by them. I do often wonder if these anonymous accounts have been deployed to discredit people challenging germ theory. They’re doing a great job of that. A+
To that I say…
It’s SARS-CoV-2 to be precise, but you’re picking up what I’m putting down. The (real) people who argue with me about both the virus and the disease not existing don’t realize they can’t get through to the masses without speaking their language. People (or op accounts) will say that COVID cannot exist because SARS-CoV-2 does not exist. But, ironically, many of the same people/accounts say COVID is the flu. By their logic, the flu cannot exist because the influenza virus does not exist. That’s some first-rate hypocrisy.
Names of diseases are merely identifiers for a collection of symptoms. Would you have gone up to a kid in the 1950s and told them they didn’t have poliomyelitis because the polio virus doesn’t exist? I would hope not. Just because the name is suggestive of a virus (by design) doesn’t mean that child doesn’t suffer from inflammation of the spinal column. The name “poliomyelitis” is how we identify that condition, just like how we use “COVID” to describe a condition that has some similarities to the flu but tends to be more severe for many, often comes with additional symptoms, and has been shown to have a much longer duration than the typical flu. Telling people they didn’t have COVID is an imbecilic way to approach them about the existence of a virus.
Luckily, my Twitter account isn’t completely dedicated to this topic and I don’t live in a bubble. People are well aware from their own experiences (which do matter) that something changed in 2019/2020, even if they unfortunately believe that it was a virus that hitchhiked across the world. I fall under the 16.4% of voters in this poll who think there might be a connection between the typical seasonal flu and COVID. If you see past the one-pathogen, one-disease model, you might understand how these two diseases could exist on the same spectrum. Merely speculation…
So, when people tell millions of others they didn’t have the illness that they clearly had because of their unhealthy obsession with semantics, they’re driving people away from learning the truth. This plays right into the hands of those pulling the strings of fake pandemics and allows them to maintain a stranglehold on the minds of the masses.
A major problem of the whole no virus discussion is that the people on the pro virus side often confuse the cause of disease with the mere existence of disease. No serious acting people on the no virus side deny the existence of diseases. We only deny the cause of diseases which simply viruses can't be, because their existence is not proven yet. Of course do health issues like 'polio'myelitis exist, alone they can't be caused by a non existing pathogen called polio virus.
Because of 100% loss of trust, denial of treatment, the death protocols and a highly suspect testing technology and regimen, it is impossible, at this juncture, for anyone outside the inner circle that planned this whole mess to separate the fly sh!t from the pepper. At this point I think even the perps may have lost the bubble. The thing the perpetrators are best at is PsyOps and propaganda. They know that the most powerful lies are 90% truth, and they will tell a 100% truth if it is in the service of a lie. White is black and black is white. The world is upside down. Lord help us!