Those *viruses exist* ppl are missing out on the opportunity of their lifetime. They could be rich. Filthy rich if they could do what no one has ever done. Prove the existence of a single virus the experts have declared are real. Trillions have been payed into the fake "science" of virology and it's machinations so a parasite like Gates would pay a billion $ with no hesitation to put the debate to rest. But they can't. Cowan and Baileys and the like have simply outlined the scientific criteria necessary to show the existence of viruses. Virologists are no-call no-shows. They've forfeited their right to claim the existence of viruses.
A major problem of the whole no virus discussion is that the people on the pro virus side often confuse the cause of disease with the mere existence of disease. No serious acting people on the no virus side deny the existence of diseases. We only deny the cause of diseases which simply viruses can't be, because their existence is not proven yet. Of course do health issues like 'polio'myelitis exist, alone they can't be caused by a non existing pathogen called polio virus.
Yes, people who get sick automatically say they "caught _______" because they have been programmed to do so, while plenty of the no-virus people will imply everyone is stupid and say nothing changed even when there is a distinct shift in symptoms.
Many people in the no-virus camp (you can find some gems in the comments) are not even curious about the events of 2019/2020 which were planned decades in advance with a high level of sophistication. It feels like many people on the no-virus side want to sound like they know everything all of the time. Disease is caused by things we can't see. The little data available to us is unreliable. It's apparently easier for them to make claims that contradict people's reality and then demand that those same people accept their opinions as fact. Trying to explain to people that it wasn't a virus that made them ill is one thing, but telling them they didn't have COVID (when all their symptoms matched the description COVID and they experienced new symptoms they never had with the flu) is so, so unhelpful.
The "CONVID" thing is also just dumb. Yes, you can con the world into believing there was a viral pandemic when there wasn't, but many people experienced *something* that was very real so these silly names don't really have a great impact outside of small bubbles.
This is why 99% of the world isn't listening at all. Finding people on the internet who already think like us isn't getting the message out to the masses. I've made a point of observing people lately and I can safely say they are still very much in virus world. Here are some things I have seen recently:
1. People wearing (usually N95) masks in public
2. People obsessively using hand sanitizer
3. People using paper towels when opening doors
4. Parents telling kids not to touch things because of germs that will make them sick
5. People still referring to a pandemic
The programming goes DEEP and saying "COVID doesn't exist" is not moving the needle whatsoever.
Moving the needle would be great, but it’s a separate issue from the fact a virus has never been proven to cause illness or exist at all. It doesn’t require a degree in microbiology to understand this concept, in fact that could be a hindrance, as institutionalised indoctrination in this case at odds with basic logic.
I don't think that monocausality applies to most health issues. Except in case of injury it's the sum of influences. That's why I still think it would be helpful to approach to the real causative subjects in taking out the fictional ones like viruses. If not, we will inevitably stick in the vicious circle. People will hold on to the most convenient culprit that absolves them from responsibility.
There was no shift. Just a change in focus to particular symptoms.
If a non-expert was previously looking at all road traffic, then later switched focus to Porsche 911s only, a Porsche 911 problem would soon appear.
Covid symptoms were nothing new. They used to get labelled as a bad cold, a bad flu, pneumonia, and so on. When those symptoms were grouped and name, and everyone got 24/7 training (and rewards!) for recognising them, voila, suddenly everywhere people looked, they saw covid.
When the only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. When the only test is a covid test, every disease (and even the absence of disease) looks like covid.
There is no pre-covid baseline of symptoms with which to compare, nobody was counting these grouped ailments before covid.
So all that’s left is naked assertions, i.e. assertions without empirical and controlled evidence.
In the absence of an empirical baseline, the only rational position is to assume propaganda is responsible for what was observed, and what was observed was the result of being told what to see.
Because of 100% loss of trust, denial of treatment, the death protocols and a highly suspect testing technology and regimen, it is impossible, at this juncture, for anyone outside the inner circle that planned this whole mess to separate the fly sh!t from the pepper. At this point I think even the perps may have lost the bubble. The thing the perpetrators are best at is PsyOps and propaganda. They know that the most powerful lies are 90% truth, and they will tell a 100% truth if it is in the service of a lie. White is black and black is white. The world is upside down. Lord help us!
Ricky, first time to see your SS, good job. I like this last part
"So, when people tell millions of others they didn’t have the illness that they clearly had because of their unhealthy obsession with semantics, they’re driving people away from learning the truth. This plays right into the hands of those pulling the strings of fake pandemics and allows them to maintain a stranglehold on the minds of the masses...."
You do have a real point here. My personal opinion-is that the confusion is caused by the fact that a few different things were happening in different places causing different illness syndromes and this got conflated giving the quote above value.
For example
1. Relabeling colds and flu
2. Post PCR test illness
3 . Using mask illness
4. 5G illness esp turned up on certain locales, add pollution.
5. Hospital protocol illness
So we are expecting similar illnesses but these factors may different symptom clusters and THAT CONFUSED THE PEOPLE. Easier to believe that a Covid virus can cause all of them.
So Covid does mean Sars-Cov-2 but, "covid-like symptoms" allows for other illness. So if we can agree with folks that they had a Covid-like syndrome but not Covid we can allow for a diversity of causes.
Our side seems to be fighting through the censorship and trying to get the message out. When viruses no longer exist, their health measure tyranny evaporates. They will pivot to something else, but they are really invested in this one.
Saying there was no Cv19 virus does not necessarily mean that something wasn't released that gave people symptoms. Hopefully, people can distinguish the difference as it still allows for a scamdemic staged by the global cabal, without swallowing the lies re. a deadly virus spreading the world.
I agree! There were areas where people were really sick. I have a friend who is a navy physician. He was deployed to NYC. Said he’s never seen anything like it. I’ve seen graphs plotting where severe disease occurred like northern Italy. What is the explanation for this? I’ve become a virus denier just by reading various arguments but I think there’s something to the Covid thing. It’s just not what we’ve been told. Radiation illness from 5 G ? I don’t know!!
Maybe look for the timeline and run out of the pandemic and 5g rollout and then ask more questions. The tests for covid or whatever are proven to be false, they haven’t isolated it as well. Then maybe look back at other pandemics timelines and introduction of AC electricity, radio, radar , satellites, mobile phones etc.
PCRs don't detect viruses, because viruses have never been properly isolated. You can't build machines to detect something unless you have that something to design the machine around.
Most diseases are defined by symptomology. Obviously, that leaves a lot of gray area. Some people had most , if not all, the symptoms and they persisted for weeks to months. The more severe cases were pretty unique to most people.
Was there a NOVEL illness with pathognomonic features, such as: 'silent hypoxia', anosmia/ageusia, most severe myalgia ever, blood clots, brain fog, and asymptomatic transmission, that appeared suddenly and everywhere all at once in 2020 and the features of which distinguish this illness from ordinary bouts of seasonal flu?
Were there really 'so many babies on ECMO' to justify all the fuss?
Doesn't sound novel to me either, but there's many medical practitioners still convinced that "covid" is a unique illness or syndrome never seen before.
They are bought and paid for fools, whose paycheck depends on them saying this. All the doctors who speak even partial truth are fired and sued into the ground.
'Covid' obviously exists because the symptoms of 'covid' include everything from having no symptoms at all to dying of multi organ failure (and everything in between). 'Covid' is therefore a meaningless term and this should always be pointed out whenever a person uses the word.
As for 'SARS COV2' or any other alleged 'virus', it should always be pointed out that these are imaginary constructs with no scientific / evidential basis.
When someone speaks of 'the virus', 'the unicorn', 'the spaghetti monster', 'the bogey man' it is essential to stop the conversation and politely request that person provide evidence of the 'entity' they just referred to. Doing this is how we emerged from the dark ages of superstition, and this is also how we avoid sliding back into a new dark age of superstition.
It really is that simple.
Anyone who says "We shouldn't demand proof of unicorns because that would upset unicorn believers" doesn't understand how science, empiricism or philosophy works.
A collection of symptoms with no clear cause is a syndrome -- not a disease. A disease (usually) has a claimed cause. And Convid is no exception. Here is the CDC's definition: "COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is a disease caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2." As the "virus" doesn't exist, neither does Covid.
Just because the authorities got the jump on claiming causation (incorrectly) doesn't mean people didn't have a disease. There have been (censored) people who have tried very hard to identify causation. A man was allegedly murdered over it at Pitt. I literally referenced poliomyelitis and polio virus above so people wouldn't write what you just did. Bummer.
We use symptomology to help define disease under the current paradigm, no? The term "syndrome" is even more vague than the term "disease." AIDS, for example, has over 20 defining "diseases" associated with it.
It doesn't necessarily mean that people don't have a disease. But in the case of Convid it does. A contrasting case is pellagra. It was believed to be caused by germ until it was shown to be niacin deficiency. I would accept pellagra as a disease.
But Convid's defining symptom is a positive PCR test, which is completely fraudulent (it was made without any isolated virus, allegedly because it was done before the virus had been isolated but actually because there is no isolated virus). So, the whole idea of Convid as a disease is nonsensical. As a shorthand, Convid doesn't exist or is fake.
As for AIDS, it just illustrates my point. A syndrome doesn't need to have a cause. Thus, the S in AIDS is appropriate.
You know a PCR test isn't a symptom, just a misused tool. People were symptomatic before PCR tests were even used. I feel like people missed it as it was happening and are rewriting history to suit narratives. I observed it. I don't think people were hospitalized with a fake disease. That's a weird claim.
Syndromes can be whatever "complex" people come up with, but AIDS-defining diseases do have causes.
I don't understand your comment fully. What do you mean by "people were symptomatic before PCR"? Do you mean people had "Covid symptoms" (i.e., cold and flu symptoms) before any Covid PCR test? If so, I agree -- colds and flus are old. But then so what? Or do you mean that there's a new Covid symptom (new as in not in the cold/flu list)?
Also, what do you mean by "people were hospitalized with a fake disease"? Do you think that people got a new disease, not colds/flus, and were in hospital for this disease?
Part of what I wrote about was that there is an overlap with flu but there are additional symptoms that people typically don't have when they get flu, the severity was greater (especially in spring 2020) and it lasted much longer in duration. I covered basically everything you've said here.
Somewhere I thought that I'd replied to this comment. Maybe I forgot to post it. Anyway, I don't see where you covered this question, only that you asserted, without evidence, that there are additional symptoms with Covid (what are they??) and that "Covid ... has been shown to have a much longer duration than the typical flu"! But one cannot show *anything* about Covid when there's no valid diagnostic test for it.
Many, many people I talk to have trouble with this. They will even say "there was no pandemic", however, they are convinced that "there was a new sickness".
Yes, even I had a very bad flu in Feb 2019, and a relapse in Oct 2019, each lasting at least 6 weeks. But it is inappropriate to string together anecdotes like mine from disparate locales and draw conclusions generally. To find a cause of sickness, the individual person must be examined, their lifestyle, history, food, environment, psychological/spiritual health, etc.
COVID-sickness or Syndrome or Disease (as you point out) each has a very specific definition. These all can be shown to be false multiple ways, including: 1) no virus isolated, 2) no new syndrome identified, 3) no rigorous etiology performed, etc.
No matter whether you are pushing the reality of fake viruses (like SARS-CoV-2) or a fake Disease (like COVID-19), or a new sickness/Syndrome, these ALL have the same net effect: JUSTIFICATION for every "countermeasure" -- masks, mandates, isolation, clotshots, lockdowns, coercion -- which collectively were responsible for est. ~20M - ~50M deaths worldwide.
I love when people add things I didn't say to make an argument that's irrelevant.
Too many people that have made a personality out of going against mainstream narratives don't seem to have a clue as to the sophistication of this operation. When you pretend it's simple and that nothing changed except messaging, I'm sure it makes you feel smarter.
The masses aren't listening and won't. Your efforts aren't for change. They're for....well...you tell us.
This is exactly where I am in my understanding of the human body, mind, psyche and subconscious. German New Medicine and Metaphysical Anatomy are excellent sources regarding this angle.
This is the very attitude and language highlighted in this piece. Announcing that you're unsubscribing with no rebuttal drives home the point that the majority will NEVER take dissident opinion seriously.
The fact viruses aren't real is the fundamental pilar of the whole hoax. Why are you trying so hard to cover that up? 🤨
There is NOTHING more important than showing everyone it was all fake. Keeping the germ hypothesis alive only keeps the door open for the so called tyrants to pull this trick again.
I literally called germ theory fraudulent in this post.
Why are so many people who challenge germ theory seemingly illiterate? The best case scenario is that this group is lazy and stubborn which won't win anyone over. The worst case scenario is that it has been infiltrated by operatives to discredit the movement.
Except everything else I have written has resulted in dialogue to help people do exactly that.
Every single person who put a negative comment here has never participated in anything I've ever done. That tells me what I wrote struck a chord and no one wants to address the problem. Once again, thanks for proving my point.
Faking a pandemic to justify all the following actions of destruction is as well a crime as faking a raid to justify self defense. It's misrepresentation and fraud.
The free from jail card argument is often used by Del Bigtree. That's a bullshit argument.
Fraud is justiciable. Especially in the case of the convid show with fraud and misinterpretation in unprecedented size and manner.
This debate about the existence of viruses, is the most important topic on our planet, as this FALSE BELIEF is the Core Belief in the Modern CULT of ViroLIEgy and this BELIEF of FEARING the Invisible "Virus" is being used to HERD the people like Cattle to the Slaughter, while also allowing the Jab All Criminals to get away with how they actually cause the illnesses they "claim" are caused by this "Invisible particle" - Many have now shown that the tests are flawed, genetic sequencing can be manipulated and there are ZERO Control Studies proving the existence of any Invisible "Virus".
We can not afford for this "Science Cult" to dominate our subconscious fear of the unknown.
“Anthony Fauci will go down in the Roman Overlord’s Hall of Fame. For the past 30 years, he has convinced the world about the reality of viruses, from HIV to the coronavirus pandemic. He has taken something invisible, something unproven, and convinced the world to not only believe in it but to invest in it, ensuring every citizen received this new petrochemical shot.”
You've made such a silly, short sighted, comment just because, at this moment in time, you are incapable of thinking outside of the box.
Have you explored the new pesticides Trump approved, do you understand what went into the 2019 flu shots, do you know what the "China balloons" deployed i.e. the ones they shot out the sky, do you know about the Graphene Oxide that was found in medications, cereals, masks etc., can a "gain-of-function" sequence be synthetically manufactured i.e. NOT A VIRUS as that would mean OUR BODIES "replicate" and "spread" it i.e. WE DON'T WORK LIKE THAT. Do you understand the implications of modulated EMF's or the effects of new frequencies on the elderly and those with co-morbidities, what research have you done regarding the complete ineffectiveness of the RT-PCR tests, do you know how genetic sequencing can be manipulated ?????????? etc. etc. etc.
You need to wake up like many doctors are now doing -
Dr. Lee Merritt, MD, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny & Dr. Larry Palevsky. MD are three more medical doctors that have realized the erroneousness of virology!
Take a look at www.viroliegy.com to begin getting a grasp of this subject and stop looking at the world through the Germ Theory Glasses you have been programmed to use.
Please don't comment until you've actually looked into this matter. Really!
Sorry - I forgot the article you wrote lol - and misinterpreted your response to my initial comment lol -
I've now read x3 of your interesting articles and wholly concur on the manner in which you are approaching your "critical thinking". The novel flu-like detox the gave the name Covid had a very broad listing of symptoms i.e. catch net, that the nocebo effect coupled with the completely ineffective RT-PCR test made "believers" of many - The point I'm making is that a one point x1500 student's CvD "positive" tests where reevaluated to see if they where not possibly "Influenza A/B" positive :) and you guessed it, sure enough they were lol :) - So! this system of "one cause", "a test" and "one label for a wide range of detox/cleansing symptoms" does create a problem for those who are largely ignorant about Terrain Theory.
There being an “it” in the manner portrayed by the official story is certainly a reasonable thing to question.
I have documented on my stack how, at least in certain places such as here in Canada, absolutely nothing happened as per the official government’s own data in terms of any departure from normal mortality trends until after the WHO global pandic announcement and the institution of absolute lunacy that immediately followed. And even then, the overwhelming vast majority of excess mortality is clearly seen in just a few locations in a very specific age/demographic. None of that adds up to the story of a “novel disease”, virus or no virus.
Whatever did happen if anything, pointing out the very much absent properly scientific / evidentiary / empirical basis for the story as proposed is valid.
Perhaps not, but PCR as used certainly couldn't ascertain whether that was the case. Many falsely thought they "had" something cause of that. A closer analysis of any unusual departure from normal mortality trends is warranted. And beyond that, how is one to tell if anything of note happened? Separating out the propaganda and PCR fueled idiocy from people's self described experiences seems impossible.
Those *viruses exist* ppl are missing out on the opportunity of their lifetime. They could be rich. Filthy rich if they could do what no one has ever done. Prove the existence of a single virus the experts have declared are real. Trillions have been payed into the fake "science" of virology and it's machinations so a parasite like Gates would pay a billion $ with no hesitation to put the debate to rest. But they can't. Cowan and Baileys and the like have simply outlined the scientific criteria necessary to show the existence of viruses. Virologists are no-call no-shows. They've forfeited their right to claim the existence of viruses.
A major problem of the whole no virus discussion is that the people on the pro virus side often confuse the cause of disease with the mere existence of disease. No serious acting people on the no virus side deny the existence of diseases. We only deny the cause of diseases which simply viruses can't be, because their existence is not proven yet. Of course do health issues like 'polio'myelitis exist, alone they can't be caused by a non existing pathogen called polio virus.
Yes, people who get sick automatically say they "caught _______" because they have been programmed to do so, while plenty of the no-virus people will imply everyone is stupid and say nothing changed even when there is a distinct shift in symptoms.
Many people in the no-virus camp (you can find some gems in the comments) are not even curious about the events of 2019/2020 which were planned decades in advance with a high level of sophistication. It feels like many people on the no-virus side want to sound like they know everything all of the time. Disease is caused by things we can't see. The little data available to us is unreliable. It's apparently easier for them to make claims that contradict people's reality and then demand that those same people accept their opinions as fact. Trying to explain to people that it wasn't a virus that made them ill is one thing, but telling them they didn't have COVID (when all their symptoms matched the description COVID and they experienced new symptoms they never had with the flu) is so, so unhelpful.
The "CONVID" thing is also just dumb. Yes, you can con the world into believing there was a viral pandemic when there wasn't, but many people experienced *something* that was very real so these silly names don't really have a great impact outside of small bubbles.
This is why 99% of the world isn't listening at all. Finding people on the internet who already think like us isn't getting the message out to the masses. I've made a point of observing people lately and I can safely say they are still very much in virus world. Here are some things I have seen recently:
1. People wearing (usually N95) masks in public
2. People obsessively using hand sanitizer
3. People using paper towels when opening doors
4. Parents telling kids not to touch things because of germs that will make them sick
5. People still referring to a pandemic
The programming goes DEEP and saying "COVID doesn't exist" is not moving the needle whatsoever.
Moving the needle would be great, but it’s a separate issue from the fact a virus has never been proven to cause illness or exist at all. It doesn’t require a degree in microbiology to understand this concept, in fact that could be a hindrance, as institutionalised indoctrination in this case at odds with basic logic.
Correct, hence why I wrote a separate post.
I don't think that monocausality applies to most health issues. Except in case of injury it's the sum of influences. That's why I still think it would be helpful to approach to the real causative subjects in taking out the fictional ones like viruses. If not, we will inevitably stick in the vicious circle. People will hold on to the most convenient culprit that absolves them from responsibility.
> even when there is a distinct shift in symptoms
There was no shift. Just a change in focus to particular symptoms.
If a non-expert was previously looking at all road traffic, then later switched focus to Porsche 911s only, a Porsche 911 problem would soon appear.
Covid symptoms were nothing new. They used to get labelled as a bad cold, a bad flu, pneumonia, and so on. When those symptoms were grouped and name, and everyone got 24/7 training (and rewards!) for recognising them, voila, suddenly everywhere people looked, they saw covid.
When the only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. When the only test is a covid test, every disease (and even the absence of disease) looks like covid.
There was indeed a shift in symptomology. It was observed and recorded. Symptoms don't have to be new. Many diseases have overlapping symptoms.
There is no pre-covid baseline of symptoms with which to compare, nobody was counting these grouped ailments before covid.
So all that’s left is naked assertions, i.e. assertions without empirical and controlled evidence.
In the absence of an empirical baseline, the only rational position is to assume propaganda is responsible for what was observed, and what was observed was the result of being told what to see.
They want the easy solutions.
Because of 100% loss of trust, denial of treatment, the death protocols and a highly suspect testing technology and regimen, it is impossible, at this juncture, for anyone outside the inner circle that planned this whole mess to separate the fly sh!t from the pepper. At this point I think even the perps may have lost the bubble. The thing the perpetrators are best at is PsyOps and propaganda. They know that the most powerful lies are 90% truth, and they will tell a 100% truth if it is in the service of a lie. White is black and black is white. The world is upside down. Lord help us!
Ricky, first time to see your SS, good job. I like this last part
"So, when people tell millions of others they didn’t have the illness that they clearly had because of their unhealthy obsession with semantics, they’re driving people away from learning the truth. This plays right into the hands of those pulling the strings of fake pandemics and allows them to maintain a stranglehold on the minds of the masses...."
You do have a real point here. My personal opinion-is that the confusion is caused by the fact that a few different things were happening in different places causing different illness syndromes and this got conflated giving the quote above value.
For example
1. Relabeling colds and flu
2. Post PCR test illness
3 . Using mask illness
4. 5G illness esp turned up on certain locales, add pollution.
5. Hospital protocol illness
So we are expecting similar illnesses but these factors may different symptom clusters and THAT CONFUSED THE PEOPLE. Easier to believe that a Covid virus can cause all of them.
So Covid does mean Sars-Cov-2 but, "covid-like symptoms" allows for other illness. So if we can agree with folks that they had a Covid-like syndrome but not Covid we can allow for a diversity of causes.
Good observations! Thank you.
Our side seems to be fighting through the censorship and trying to get the message out. When viruses no longer exist, their health measure tyranny evaporates. They will pivot to something else, but they are really invested in this one.
We're also fighting against Sasha Latypova who is deciding who is allowed to share information. You can't make this stuff up.
It get complicated fast. Hard to tell who is who. Over time it is revealed.
I agree. We just have to stick to the arguments we can back up.
Saying there was no Cv19 virus does not necessarily mean that something wasn't released that gave people symptoms. Hopefully, people can distinguish the difference as it still allows for a scamdemic staged by the global cabal, without swallowing the lies re. a deadly virus spreading the world.
People are having a hard time with this one, but we're on the same page.
I agree! There were areas where people were really sick. I have a friend who is a navy physician. He was deployed to NYC. Said he’s never seen anything like it. I’ve seen graphs plotting where severe disease occurred like northern Italy. What is the explanation for this? I’ve become a virus denier just by reading various arguments but I think there’s something to the Covid thing. It’s just not what we’ve been told. Radiation illness from 5 G ? I don’t know!!
I think it certainly played a role. https://rickyrants.substack.com/p/what-is-covid
Thank you!!
Maybe look for the timeline and run out of the pandemic and 5g rollout and then ask more questions. The tests for covid or whatever are proven to be false, they haven’t isolated it as well. Then maybe look back at other pandemics timelines and introduction of AC electricity, radio, radar , satellites, mobile phones etc.
Agreed. I touch on these things in:
https://rickyrants.substack.com/p/the-no-virus-argument-is-not-a-distraction
https://rickyrants.substack.com/p/what-is-covid
Hey i have a question. If the PCR tests are completely unreliable as I've read, how does anyone know whether or not they've ever had Covid?
PCRs don't detect viruses, because viruses have never been properly isolated. You can't build machines to detect something unless you have that something to design the machine around.
Most diseases are defined by symptomology. Obviously, that leaves a lot of gray area. Some people had most , if not all, the symptoms and they persisted for weeks to months. The more severe cases were pretty unique to most people.
Excellent break down, sir!
Thanks!
maybe maybe not exactly.
Was there a NOVEL illness with pathognomonic features, such as: 'silent hypoxia', anosmia/ageusia, most severe myalgia ever, blood clots, brain fog, and asymptomatic transmission, that appeared suddenly and everywhere all at once in 2020 and the features of which distinguish this illness from ordinary bouts of seasonal flu?
Were there really 'so many babies on ECMO' to justify all the fuss?
I'm not even claiming it was novel, because I know COVID was a planned operation. That meant the powers that be already knew what was going to happen.
All the propaganda that came out after people started announcing their weeks-long super flus should be taken with a grain of salt.
Doesn't sound novel to me either, but there's many medical practitioners still convinced that "covid" is a unique illness or syndrome never seen before.
Freaky.
Certainly it was new to many people. Really, though, there's nothing new under the sun.
They are bought and paid for fools, whose paycheck depends on them saying this. All the doctors who speak even partial truth are fired and sued into the ground.
'Covid' obviously exists because the symptoms of 'covid' include everything from having no symptoms at all to dying of multi organ failure (and everything in between). 'Covid' is therefore a meaningless term and this should always be pointed out whenever a person uses the word.
As for 'SARS COV2' or any other alleged 'virus', it should always be pointed out that these are imaginary constructs with no scientific / evidential basis.
When someone speaks of 'the virus', 'the unicorn', 'the spaghetti monster', 'the bogey man' it is essential to stop the conversation and politely request that person provide evidence of the 'entity' they just referred to. Doing this is how we emerged from the dark ages of superstition, and this is also how we avoid sliding back into a new dark age of superstition.
It really is that simple.
Anyone who says "We shouldn't demand proof of unicorns because that would upset unicorn believers" doesn't understand how science, empiricism or philosophy works.
Pretty good summary of what I've said.
A collection of symptoms with no clear cause is a syndrome -- not a disease. A disease (usually) has a claimed cause. And Convid is no exception. Here is the CDC's definition: "COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is a disease caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2." As the "virus" doesn't exist, neither does Covid.
Just because the authorities got the jump on claiming causation (incorrectly) doesn't mean people didn't have a disease. There have been (censored) people who have tried very hard to identify causation. A man was allegedly murdered over it at Pitt. I literally referenced poliomyelitis and polio virus above so people wouldn't write what you just did. Bummer.
We use symptomology to help define disease under the current paradigm, no? The term "syndrome" is even more vague than the term "disease." AIDS, for example, has over 20 defining "diseases" associated with it.
It doesn't necessarily mean that people don't have a disease. But in the case of Convid it does. A contrasting case is pellagra. It was believed to be caused by germ until it was shown to be niacin deficiency. I would accept pellagra as a disease.
But Convid's defining symptom is a positive PCR test, which is completely fraudulent (it was made without any isolated virus, allegedly because it was done before the virus had been isolated but actually because there is no isolated virus). So, the whole idea of Convid as a disease is nonsensical. As a shorthand, Convid doesn't exist or is fake.
As for AIDS, it just illustrates my point. A syndrome doesn't need to have a cause. Thus, the S in AIDS is appropriate.
You know a PCR test isn't a symptom, just a misused tool. People were symptomatic before PCR tests were even used. I feel like people missed it as it was happening and are rewriting history to suit narratives. I observed it. I don't think people were hospitalized with a fake disease. That's a weird claim.
Syndromes can be whatever "complex" people come up with, but AIDS-defining diseases do have causes.
I don't understand your comment fully. What do you mean by "people were symptomatic before PCR"? Do you mean people had "Covid symptoms" (i.e., cold and flu symptoms) before any Covid PCR test? If so, I agree -- colds and flus are old. But then so what? Or do you mean that there's a new Covid symptom (new as in not in the cold/flu list)?
Also, what do you mean by "people were hospitalized with a fake disease"? Do you think that people got a new disease, not colds/flus, and were in hospital for this disease?
Part of what I wrote about was that there is an overlap with flu but there are additional symptoms that people typically don't have when they get flu, the severity was greater (especially in spring 2020) and it lasted much longer in duration. I covered basically everything you've said here.
Somewhere I thought that I'd replied to this comment. Maybe I forgot to post it. Anyway, I don't see where you covered this question, only that you asserted, without evidence, that there are additional symptoms with Covid (what are they??) and that "Covid ... has been shown to have a much longer duration than the typical flu"! But one cannot show *anything* about Covid when there's no valid diagnostic test for it.
Bingo, Sanjoy. 💯%
Many, many people I talk to have trouble with this. They will even say "there was no pandemic", however, they are convinced that "there was a new sickness".
Yes, even I had a very bad flu in Feb 2019, and a relapse in Oct 2019, each lasting at least 6 weeks. But it is inappropriate to string together anecdotes like mine from disparate locales and draw conclusions generally. To find a cause of sickness, the individual person must be examined, their lifestyle, history, food, environment, psychological/spiritual health, etc.
COVID-sickness or Syndrome or Disease (as you point out) each has a very specific definition. These all can be shown to be false multiple ways, including: 1) no virus isolated, 2) no new syndrome identified, 3) no rigorous etiology performed, etc.
No matter whether you are pushing the reality of fake viruses (like SARS-CoV-2) or a fake Disease (like COVID-19), or a new sickness/Syndrome, these ALL have the same net effect: JUSTIFICATION for every "countermeasure" -- masks, mandates, isolation, clotshots, lockdowns, coercion -- which collectively were responsible for est. ~20M - ~50M deaths worldwide.
I love when people add things I didn't say to make an argument that's irrelevant.
Too many people that have made a personality out of going against mainstream narratives don't seem to have a clue as to the sophistication of this operation. When you pretend it's simple and that nothing changed except messaging, I'm sure it makes you feel smarter.
The masses aren't listening and won't. Your efforts aren't for change. They're for....well...you tell us.
There is no disease. Only toxic buildup or trauma, and then the body's response to it aka the therapy. Oddly enough we call that disease.
Semantics.
This is exactly where I am in my understanding of the human body, mind, psyche and subconscious. German New Medicine and Metaphysical Anatomy are excellent sources regarding this angle.
Mostly incorrect and dumb. Unsubscribed.
This is the very attitude and language highlighted in this piece. Announcing that you're unsubscribing with no rebuttal drives home the point that the majority will NEVER take dissident opinion seriously.
Of course nothing was proven incorrect.
The fact viruses aren't real is the fundamental pilar of the whole hoax. Why are you trying so hard to cover that up? 🤨
There is NOTHING more important than showing everyone it was all fake. Keeping the germ hypothesis alive only keeps the door open for the so called tyrants to pull this trick again.
I literally called germ theory fraudulent in this post.
Why are so many people who challenge germ theory seemingly illiterate? The best case scenario is that this group is lazy and stubborn which won't win anyone over. The worst case scenario is that it has been infiltrated by operatives to discredit the movement.
The Government LIES,
Proof of that being that airliners could never penetrate skyscraper walls
"like a hot knife through butter" . . .
Yes...?
you can highlight whatever you want but "pieces" like yours is the very reason we're not getting off this carousel of fraud and deceit anytime soon.
Except everything else I have written has resulted in dialogue to help people do exactly that.
Every single person who put a negative comment here has never participated in anything I've ever done. That tells me what I wrote struck a chord and no one wants to address the problem. Once again, thanks for proving my point.
Faking a pandemic to justify all the following actions of destruction is as well a crime as faking a raid to justify self defense. It's misrepresentation and fraud.
The free from jail card argument is often used by Del Bigtree. That's a bullshit argument.
Fraud is justiciable. Especially in the case of the convid show with fraud and misinterpretation in unprecedented size and manner.
This debate about the existence of viruses, is the most important topic on our planet, as this FALSE BELIEF is the Core Belief in the Modern CULT of ViroLIEgy and this BELIEF of FEARING the Invisible "Virus" is being used to HERD the people like Cattle to the Slaughter, while also allowing the Jab All Criminals to get away with how they actually cause the illnesses they "claim" are caused by this "Invisible particle" - Many have now shown that the tests are flawed, genetic sequencing can be manipulated and there are ZERO Control Studies proving the existence of any Invisible "Virus".
We can not afford for this "Science Cult" to dominate our subconscious fear of the unknown.
“Anthony Fauci will go down in the Roman Overlord’s Hall of Fame. For the past 30 years, he has convinced the world about the reality of viruses, from HIV to the coronavirus pandemic. He has taken something invisible, something unproven, and convinced the world to not only believe in it but to invest in it, ensuring every citizen received this new petrochemical shot.”
"Why It Does Matter..."
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-it-does-matter
Of course people should know why they are sick.
You've made such a silly, short sighted, comment just because, at this moment in time, you are incapable of thinking outside of the box.
Have you explored the new pesticides Trump approved, do you understand what went into the 2019 flu shots, do you know what the "China balloons" deployed i.e. the ones they shot out the sky, do you know about the Graphene Oxide that was found in medications, cereals, masks etc., can a "gain-of-function" sequence be synthetically manufactured i.e. NOT A VIRUS as that would mean OUR BODIES "replicate" and "spread" it i.e. WE DON'T WORK LIKE THAT. Do you understand the implications of modulated EMF's or the effects of new frequencies on the elderly and those with co-morbidities, what research have you done regarding the complete ineffectiveness of the RT-PCR tests, do you know how genetic sequencing can be manipulated ?????????? etc. etc. etc.
You need to wake up like many doctors are now doing -
Dr. Lee Merritt, MD, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny & Dr. Larry Palevsky. MD are three more medical doctors that have realized the erroneousness of virology!
Virology is a Belief Cult
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tRjFhkubgziq/
Take a look at www.viroliegy.com to begin getting a grasp of this subject and stop looking at the world through the Germ Theory Glasses you have been programmed to use.
Please don't comment until you've actually looked into this matter. Really!
Please don't comment until you read what I've written. You're arguing with nobody.
Sorry - I forgot the article you wrote lol - and misinterpreted your response to my initial comment lol -
I've now read x3 of your interesting articles and wholly concur on the manner in which you are approaching your "critical thinking". The novel flu-like detox the gave the name Covid had a very broad listing of symptoms i.e. catch net, that the nocebo effect coupled with the completely ineffective RT-PCR test made "believers" of many - The point I'm making is that a one point x1500 student's CvD "positive" tests where reevaluated to see if they where not possibly "Influenza A/B" positive :) and you guessed it, sure enough they were lol :) - So! this system of "one cause", "a test" and "one label for a wide range of detox/cleansing symptoms" does create a problem for those who are largely ignorant about Terrain Theory.
I look forward to reading more of your rants.
Be Well
There being an “it” in the manner portrayed by the official story is certainly a reasonable thing to question.
I have documented on my stack how, at least in certain places such as here in Canada, absolutely nothing happened as per the official government’s own data in terms of any departure from normal mortality trends until after the WHO global pandic announcement and the institution of absolute lunacy that immediately followed. And even then, the overwhelming vast majority of excess mortality is clearly seen in just a few locations in a very specific age/demographic. None of that adds up to the story of a “novel disease”, virus or no virus.
Whatever did happen if anything, pointing out the very much absent properly scientific / evidentiary / empirical basis for the story as proposed is valid.
Huge mortality spikes are not necessary for there to be an unknown disease present, although there was a huge mortality spike where I am.
Perhaps not, but PCR as used certainly couldn't ascertain whether that was the case. Many falsely thought they "had" something cause of that. A closer analysis of any unusual departure from normal mortality trends is warranted. And beyond that, how is one to tell if anything of note happened? Separating out the propaganda and PCR fueled idiocy from people's self described experiences seems impossible.