It's About Time That "Truthers" Apologize To Dr. Judy Wood
Discounting her work killed any legitimate search for the truth about 9/11.
Dr. Judy Wood is a materials engineer who published the largest publicly available collection of forensic evidence from 9/11’s ground zero in NYC. Her book Where Did the Towers Go? goes hand-in-hand with her very own lectures that carefully point out physical anomalies that contradict both the mainstream narrative and the theories put forward by the popular “9/11 truth movement.” While many truthers specialize in researching the white collar crimes surrounding the events of 9/11 or even theorizing about how certain aspects of it could have been pulled off, Dr. Judy Wood has always done more observing than guessing.
With such a logical and analytical approach, one would think the leading names in the “9/11 truth movement” would be very appreciative of her work. This movement, however, is not seeking the full truth at all. It’s a multi-million dollar sham running cover for some very clandestine powers. They intentionally obfuscate the fact that planes did not crash and that traditional demolition devices were not used. These are pretty crucial topics when diving into the details of 9/11 don’t you think? If you don’t know what I’m talking about, check out the post below and then return here.
The False Flag "Rule of Three"
In writing or improv comedy, the term “rule of three” refers to a pattern of three—be it action, punchlines, whatever—that is meant to increase the effectiveness of the material with a “payoff.” A classic example would be the three house-demolishing efforts of the Big Bad Wolf in
People devoting countless hours to finding the truth cannot really believe the powers behind the largest false flag attack of our lifetime would not have a contingency plan for skepticism…right?!? Am I supposed to believe many of them didn’t see red flags within their own movement? Or were some people planted there to ignore them and dissuade others from seeing them?
After questions were recently raised yet again about the potential use of directed energy weapons to create what appeared to be forest fires, one would think this would be the moment where those who wrote Dr. Judy Wood off would revisit her work. The fact that a lot of high-traffic content creators who make good money are not doing exactly that makes me think these people are either long-term limited hangouts or they simply care about self-preservation more than anything else. No bueno.
Earlier this week, James Corbett (The Corbett Report) and James Evan Pilato (Media Monarchy) released an episode of their joint show New World Next Week with one segment in particular focusing on the forest fires of California and Canada. Watch the clip above to see their awkward and dismissive reference to Dr. Judy Wood.
Last year, 9/11 filmmaker Jason Bermas dedicated an entire stream to smearing Dr. Judy Wood without addressing the forensic evidence she put forth.
Shameful.
Imagine what could have been accomplished by now if we didn’t let media personalities steer us away from the truth. Imagine what many of us would now understand. Imagine what tactics would no longer work on the masses.
But science was hijacked long ago. When Dr. Stanley Pons and Dr. Martin Fleischmann made breakthroughs in the field of cold fusion, the Department of Energy used Steven E. Jones to determine “science by vote” which squashed this area of research all the way back in 1989. Steven E. Jones would go on to be one of the more prominent 9/11 gatekeepers as well.
It’s no coincidence.
Love your insights as always, but I'm perceiving the Corbett-Pilato segment differently. JEP says that 20 years ago he might have dismissed Judy Woods' directed energy hypothesis, but that we can't rule out anything now; at which point, JC gives what is to me one of his subtle "you can say that again" looks. I thought they invoked her favourably, or at least neutrally. Twenty years ago a lot of us dismissed a lot of things, and have since learned not to. Your impression of the segment could form a good Questions for Corbett submission, if you were so inclined. Now I'm curious about Woods' work and will look into it. After studying the subject off and on for two decades, I've recently been surprised to discover there are still some researchers whose material I've overlooked. Thanks for calling us to look closely. Better to have too many doubts than not enough!
An executive at BofA said his team researched who made the most money from the tragedy, it was the Carlyle Group. He said "If you want to know who did what follow the money." I told this to a NSA Whistleblower she confirmed it was an inside job.