Love your insights as always, but I'm perceiving the Corbett-Pilato segment differently. JEP says that 20 years ago he might have dismissed Judy Woods' directed energy hypothesis, but that we can't rule out anything now; at which point, JC gives what is to me one of his subtle "you can say that again" looks. I thought they invoked her favourably, or at least neutrally. Twenty years ago a lot of us dismissed a lot of things, and have since learned not to. Your impression of the segment could form a good Questions for Corbett submission, if you were so inclined. Now I'm curious about Woods' work and will look into it. After studying the subject off and on for two decades, I've recently been surprised to discover there are still some researchers whose material I've overlooked. Thanks for calling us to look closely. Better to have too many doubts than not enough!
Thanks for your comment, Steve. I totally understand your interpretation.
I have to stand my ground on this one, though, because Corbett had on Richard Gage and some of those popular truthers over the years. When asked about the work of Judy Wood in the past, Corbett wasn't his normal verbose self to say the least. Richard Gage acts like the forensic evidence Dr. Judy Wood collected doesn't matter. Jason Bermas outright bashes her. I linked to my previous article (https://rickyrants.substack.com/p/the-false-flag-rule-of-three) for this very reason. You have take all that content in to understand.
I can't name a single person whose work on 9/11 is more profound than hers, so the fact that they have acted like she is a crazy kook when they have made money off of embracing the roles of the crazy kooks (from a mainstream perspective) doesn't sit right with me.
So, 20 years ago this was some crazy kook talk but now it's okay to give it a nod and move on with very little commentary. Notice how the usually-thorough Corbett didn't even put that reference into context.
Thanks for the considerate and thorough response. After sleeping on it, I'd wanted to add that I really don't know what either of the Jameses' take on Wood's research is, and that I would understand taking their relative silence (so it appears) as dismissal. Especially considering Gage has been interviewed, and from what I see AE9/11 Truth had attempted to "debunk" her research.
I'd also wanted to retract my statement that "Twenty years ago a lot of us dismissed a lot of things." I doubt that either you or I dismissed anything out of hand even then!
I'll revisit your "rule of three" article, and will finally delve into Wood's work. I've no doubt encountered it in the past but clearly didn't go deep enough or would have remembered more about the points she was making. I plan to read her book.
An executive at BofA said his team researched who made the most money from the tragedy, it was the Carlyle Group. He said "If you want to know who did what follow the money." I told this to a NSA Whistleblower she confirmed it was an inside job.
I stumbled onto Dr Judy Woods earlier this year. Where was I twenty years ago?!! I knew, knew, knew the towers couldn’t fall like that but didn’t know about the seismic signals (lack of them) or the dustification. Keep up the work. Get the word out. Dr Woods deserves kind and appropriate treatment in history. She IS a scientist and her work and research don’t deserve to be hidden. We can see what is capable today with this weapon. The spies have stolen it and are also using it against us. Everyone needs to hold on to their hats! The disappearing F-35 is just the beginning (unless you believe that they actually found the wreckage).
Love your insights as always, but I'm perceiving the Corbett-Pilato segment differently. JEP says that 20 years ago he might have dismissed Judy Woods' directed energy hypothesis, but that we can't rule out anything now; at which point, JC gives what is to me one of his subtle "you can say that again" looks. I thought they invoked her favourably, or at least neutrally. Twenty years ago a lot of us dismissed a lot of things, and have since learned not to. Your impression of the segment could form a good Questions for Corbett submission, if you were so inclined. Now I'm curious about Woods' work and will look into it. After studying the subject off and on for two decades, I've recently been surprised to discover there are still some researchers whose material I've overlooked. Thanks for calling us to look closely. Better to have too many doubts than not enough!
Thanks for your comment, Steve. I totally understand your interpretation.
I have to stand my ground on this one, though, because Corbett had on Richard Gage and some of those popular truthers over the years. When asked about the work of Judy Wood in the past, Corbett wasn't his normal verbose self to say the least. Richard Gage acts like the forensic evidence Dr. Judy Wood collected doesn't matter. Jason Bermas outright bashes her. I linked to my previous article (https://rickyrants.substack.com/p/the-false-flag-rule-of-three) for this very reason. You have take all that content in to understand.
I can't name a single person whose work on 9/11 is more profound than hers, so the fact that they have acted like she is a crazy kook when they have made money off of embracing the roles of the crazy kooks (from a mainstream perspective) doesn't sit right with me.
So, 20 years ago this was some crazy kook talk but now it's okay to give it a nod and move on with very little commentary. Notice how the usually-thorough Corbett didn't even put that reference into context.
Thanks for the considerate and thorough response. After sleeping on it, I'd wanted to add that I really don't know what either of the Jameses' take on Wood's research is, and that I would understand taking their relative silence (so it appears) as dismissal. Especially considering Gage has been interviewed, and from what I see AE9/11 Truth had attempted to "debunk" her research.
I'd also wanted to retract my statement that "Twenty years ago a lot of us dismissed a lot of things." I doubt that either you or I dismissed anything out of hand even then!
I'll revisit your "rule of three" article, and will finally delve into Wood's work. I've no doubt encountered it in the past but clearly didn't go deep enough or would have remembered more about the points she was making. I plan to read her book.
Appreciate the reply. Over and out for now!
Excited to hear your thoughts! Either way, there is something weird going on. Maybe you'll see something different!
We need to band together - the disinformation peddlers have circled their wagons, as they see the awakening to their bullshit.
Steve, I have a whole playlist breaking down the various "liars" for truth talking heads: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Gatekeepers:a
Also watch the 9/11 Observable Evidence series: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Deprogramming-series:6
Most appreciated. I'm still catching up on the Wood material, but it is compelling. Will spend some time on the links you provided.
You really need to get her book, Where did the Towers Go?
It's a worthwhile investment: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
I agree! I have it. In the meantime, her website is a decent placeholder.
An executive at BofA said his team researched who made the most money from the tragedy, it was the Carlyle Group. He said "If you want to know who did what follow the money." I told this to a NSA Whistleblower she confirmed it was an inside job.
Wait until they face her implications on hurricane Erin and weather wars
This comment is all too relevant today!
I stumbled onto Dr Judy Woods earlier this year. Where was I twenty years ago?!! I knew, knew, knew the towers couldn’t fall like that but didn’t know about the seismic signals (lack of them) or the dustification. Keep up the work. Get the word out. Dr Woods deserves kind and appropriate treatment in history. She IS a scientist and her work and research don’t deserve to be hidden. We can see what is capable today with this weapon. The spies have stolen it and are also using it against us. Everyone needs to hold on to their hats! The disappearing F-35 is just the beginning (unless you believe that they actually found the wreckage).
The video does not play -plse send me a link in the comments.
The Judy Wood one seems to work. If you’re talking about the Corbett one, here it is: https://odysee.com/@slikrik2003:0/Corbett-and-Media-Monarchy-on-Dr.-Judy-Wood:2
I will fix it later. Thanks!
Thank you - do you have a longer edit on what the limited hangout Corbett had to say...
Here is a deconstruction of Corbett - https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-James-Corbet:e
Nice video. You used some of my favorite clips!
The Judy Wood mention is from this episode: https://rumble.com/v2ug9su-wildfires-from-climate-liars-newworldnextweek.html
I will check out the Corbett vid.