An interesting and well written piece. A lot of the questions you pose need to be answered. But one thing I thoroughly disagree with is the insinuation there were no planes. I was working at American Airlines then. I retired from that company. During the 9/11 incident, I was a trained call taker on the 'Care Team' which was staffed to take calls from people inquiring about family/loved ones on any planes in incidents. I and many other employees actually knew someone who perished on one or the other of the planes. They were real people. This invalidates those people as being living beings and this is wrong. I have to speak out. That said, those towers were imploded, but they had to use the planes as a cover.
Thanks for your comment. I expect people to have dramatically different responses to the opening. What you feel is valid and I am sorry you had to go through that.
I don’t deny that those people died, I just question the manner in which it happened. If one is of the opinion that this was an event planned over many years—which the almost-tidy destruction of the towers and WTC 7 suggest—then we must question if there was trickery in other areas of the story.
Yes, all of that is to be questioned. I was a student of Architecture in College years. I have not believed the story of the fall of the towers and Bldg 7 since it happened. Though I won't know the truth in my lifetime.
A lot of people lean into the Boeing remote controlled planes theory. It's understandable, because the technology existed before 2001. HOWEVER, it still doesn't explain WHY these "planes" were doing such incredible maneuvers at top speed and low altitude.
Another clue are the phone calls from passengers. Some were confirmed as coming in from cell phones that definitely didn't work when flying. This tells us these people weren't even in the air.
An interesting and well written piece. A lot of the questions you pose need to be answered. But one thing I thoroughly disagree with is the insinuation there were no planes. I was working at American Airlines then. I retired from that company. During the 9/11 incident, I was a trained call taker on the 'Care Team' which was staffed to take calls from people inquiring about family/loved ones on any planes in incidents. I and many other employees actually knew someone who perished on one or the other of the planes. They were real people. This invalidates those people as being living beings and this is wrong. I have to speak out. That said, those towers were imploded, but they had to use the planes as a cover.
An interesting and well written piece. A lot of the questions you pose need to be answered. But one thing I thoroughly disagree with is the insinuation there were no planes. I was working at American Airlines then. I retired from that company. During the 9/11 incident, I was a trained call taker on the 'Care Team' which was staffed to take calls from people inquiring about family/loved ones on any planes in incidents. I and many other employees actually knew someone who perished on one or the other of the planes. They were real people. This invalidates those people as being living beings and this is wrong. I have to speak out. That said, those towers were imploded, but they had to use the planes as a cover.
Thanks for your comment. I expect people to have dramatically different responses to the opening. What you feel is valid and I am sorry you had to go through that.
I don’t deny that those people died, I just question the manner in which it happened. If one is of the opinion that this was an event planned over many years—which the almost-tidy destruction of the towers and WTC 7 suggest—then we must question if there was trickery in other areas of the story.
Yes, all of that is to be questioned. I was a student of Architecture in College years. I have not believed the story of the fall of the towers and Bldg 7 since it happened. Though I won't know the truth in my lifetime.
A follow-up piece: https://rickyrants.substack.com/p/perpetuating-scientific-fraud-through-03f
Also, to go along with your comment on directed energy weapons, there are some GREAT videos at the end of this post: https://rickyrants.substack.com/p/the-false-flag-rule-of-three
Welcome!
A lot of people lean into the Boeing remote controlled planes theory. It's understandable, because the technology existed before 2001. HOWEVER, it still doesn't explain WHY these "planes" were doing such incredible maneuvers at top speed and low altitude.
Another clue are the phone calls from passengers. Some were confirmed as coming in from cell phones that definitely didn't work when flying. This tells us these people weren't even in the air.
Here is the follow-up piece that dives into why planes didn't crash into the World Trade Center. https://rickyrants.substack.com/p/perpetuating-scientific-fraud-through-03f
Another technology they had was holograms. Maybe I should write a piece on that!
An interesting and well written piece. A lot of the questions you pose need to be answered. But one thing I thoroughly disagree with is the insinuation there were no planes. I was working at American Airlines then. I retired from that company. During the 9/11 incident, I was a trained call taker on the 'Care Team' which was staffed to take calls from people inquiring about family/loved ones on any planes in incidents. I and many other employees actually knew someone who perished on one or the other of the planes. They were real people. This invalidates those people as being living beings and this is wrong. I have to speak out. That said, those towers were imploded, but they had to use the planes as a cover.
amazing! love it!